Tags
“Besides love and sympathy animals exhibit other qualities connected with the social instincts which in us would be called moral.” ― Charles Darwin, “If having a soul means being able to feel love and loyalty and gratitude then animals are better off than a lot of humans.”―James Herriot, “Some people talk to animals. Not many listen though. That’s the problem.” ― A.A. Milne
Beth Cavener is a sculptor who has produced a set of pieces that I find incredibly moving. She’s captured so many emotions within their forms – predator and prey, love and hate, fear and peace, they are represented. Her aim was to depict human emotions by portraying them in animal form, however personally, I feel this is not simply a case of anthropomorphism, for animals too feel every one of these emotions and they are just as much a core of their beings as it is ours. It covers the lot.
She says ”
“I choose animals to represent human characteristics, so I find that there are similarities. However, I think most of those similarities are social constructs in a way. We want to anthropomorphize animals, we want to see them as being human-like. So I think we ascribe motivations or complexity to their behavior and actions that they probably don’t actually own. But I’m not ultimately interested in what animals are really like. What I’m interested in is what we think they are like, and how we see ourselves in them. I like the idea of borrowing the perceived moral innocence of the animal, something we desire to see in ourselves, in order to highlight just how strange and complex and unlike an animal those emotional and psychological states are.
There are primitive animal instincts lurking in our own depths, waiting for the chance to slide past a conscious moment. The sculptures I create focus on human psychology, stripped of context and rationalization, and articulated through animal and human forms. On the surface, these figures are simply feral and domestic individuals suspended in a moment of tension. Beneath the surface they embody the impacts of aggression, territorial desires, isolation, and pack mentality.
Both human and animal interactions show patterns of intricate, subliminal gestures that betray intent and motivation. The things we leave unsaid are far more important than the words we speak out-loud to one another. I have learned to read meaning in the subtler signs; a look, the way one holds one’s hands, the tightening of muscles in the shoulders, the incline of the head, the rhythm of a walk, and the slightest unconscious gestures. I rely on animal body language in my work as a metaphor for these underlying patterns, transforming the animal subjects into human psychological portraits.
I want to pry at those uncomfortable, awkward edges between animal and human. The figures are feral and uneasy, expressing frustration for the human tendency towards cruelty and lack of understanding. Entangled in their own internal and external struggles, the figures are engaged with the subjects of fear, apathy, violence and powerlessness.
Something conscious and knowing is captured in their gestures and expressions. An invitation and a rebuke.”
I’m including a video of some of the pieces at the bottom of this post, because the scale and impact is all the more felt by seeing them ‘live’**.
The use of crystal and glass drops for blood is particularly effective.
The Sanguine
In Bocca al Lupo
Trapped.
Committed
The Adoration
The Sentimental Question
The Golden Netted Hare
Tangled Up in You
The Question that Devours
Your Eyes have their Silence.
L’amante.
**(Worth watching this one Roughseas)
A very sad message is sculpted very well…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed.
LikeLike
These are extraordinary! Very powerful.
LikeLiked by 2 people
They are aren’t they?!
s.u.t.C
LikeLiked by 1 person
i like
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like that you like.
s.u.t.C
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you; I watched the video which, as you suggest, gives a better impression of the scale and presence of the pieces, and I also looked at Beth’s very slick website to understand her work processes, as well as viewing a further video interview. My reaction to the work is somewhat tempered by being conscious of a degree of emotional manipulation – which the artist acknowledges, I think, in discussing the greater empathy we (perhaps) sense in viewing wild animal over human animal figures. In other words there’s a nod to the romantic and sentimental within us.
That said, I still wonder about the claim to project human psychologies onto animal forms, if, as I think many would agree with your own assertion that “animals too feel every one of these emotions and they are just as much a core of their beings as it is ours”? The conceit the artist uses therefore seems a touch awkwardly manipulative to me upon first encounter, and just for the moment, perhaps, that is affecting perceptions on what is otherwise artistically and technically high quality work. I probably sound curmudgeonly in this reaction, yet in truth, I am simply torn between praise and reservation over the apparent redundancy of the conceit. Of the above pieces, ‘Trapped’ worked best for me in terms of invoking an emotional pain, and I somehow found myself feeling the bite upon the foreleg.
Thank you for an interesting article sonmi, and for the introduction to Beth’s work.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I agree completely Hariod. She seems a bit of a cold fish to me. The centre of her work is focused upon human feelings, and mostly uses the animal form as a device to manipulate the audience. Despite this, before I read a word of hers, I saw these images and felt they actually showed us that which many people choose to ignore, the fact that animals feel love, sadness, fear and all manner of emotions, very similar, if not indeed the same as we, as humans do.
I found ‘The Sentimental Question’ and Sanguine tore at me the most, but I find them all very powerful. Despite any other meaning behind them.
You are most welcome, and thank you for commenting H smiles.
s.u.t.C
LikeLiked by 3 people
Hariod,
I watched the video on her site as well– enjoyed it, and also had some confusing reactions. I was curious if you wouldn’t mind explaining what you see as the redundancy in these pieces…? I’d like to explain what I think you are saying in case that clarifies the nature of my confusion… 🙂
So if I understand, I think you may be saying that the animals, as they already possess these emotions, when sculpted in this way are to a certain extent overdone. Meaning that the authentic way in which animals respond to and carry these feelings is somehow eminently simpler than these studies and also, or perhaps as a result thereof, inexplicably genuine/beautiful in a way that the caricatures mock somehow. Is this something like what you are saying?
I find the actual sculpture really powerfully done, the above sentiments notwithstanding, and there were moments watching her work when I felt the animals had given of their presence as “friends” to help her carry these difficulties. I felt that in just a flash of an instant when she was working on the lion– as if it was there daring her to see him as he really was.
Anyway, my apologies for butting in, Sonmi!
Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi Michael!
We may well have watched different videos I think, and the one I viewed was a brief interview with Beth at what appeared to be an opening show of hers in a gallery. As regards what I referred to as the ‘redundancy’ of the artists conceit, I was meaning no more than I already expressed above, which is to say that invoking human psychologies into the frame seems unnecessary – unless we imagine that animals do not experience related emotional states, that they are almost akin to David Chalmer’s zombies, with no qualia apprehended in their experience.
My guess would be that most would not accept that wholly and wildly anthropocentric view, although I may well be wrong of course. Perhaps many view non-human animals as sentient in only a very basic, functional way, relating solely to motor responses and instinctual self-interest? I am sure Beth is completely genuine in her portrayals, and would not for a moment wish to question her integrity; yet for me, the rest of the animal world ought be accepted on its own terms, as against being seen both as a resource for humankind’s usage, as well as needing to be qualified in our own arrogant terms.
That being said, it seems that you, Sonmi and I all agree on the excellence and acute sensitivity of Beth’s work. You know me well enough to allow me my minor bouts of contrarianism Michael, and which continue to be part of my make-up. In art-forms, I look for an almost visceral feeling – of harmony, balance, a sort of natural resonance that the senses pick up prior to the operations of the intellect – as opposed to latching onto quasi-philosophical ideas. If these feelings are absent, what remains is that same intellect, seeking what it is that feels out of kilter; and that is where the contrarianism comes in it seems. It helps me to understand my own responses more than anything, and is utterly valueless to others of course!
Good to engage with you as always dear friend!
Hariod
LikeLiked by 2 people
I found the works disturbing, and no I haven’t yet watched the vid. I saw a picture on FB of a Podenco the other day in what looked like some sort of pillory 😦 so that probably didn’t help when I was looking at these.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes they are disturbing, and I hope others think so too. If it makes people feel grim then some of the people who never think of animals as having these emotions and view them as stupid or just beings to hunt and eat might have a small amount of their belief on the matter chipped away at a little. For those of us who are already there such as us, it’s very unpleasant I know, a deeper cut, as we feel for the wee souls pain. You needn’t watch the video mind you if it makes you feel miserable, for myself, I wanted to get a feel for their scale, see them in 3d.
LikeLike
What bold and phenomenally provocative art. Mesmerizing, disturbing, mesmerizing, an odd serenity….repeat loop. 🙂 Harlon
LikeLike
Well said that man. I love the style of them, they’re emotional pieces, to see them in the ‘flesh’ must be quite something.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My KFC toque took on a completely different meaning after seeing this video. It is now been sent to greener pastures.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aw. That’s a good thing I’d say. Kindness is all. smiles and nods.
LikeLiked by 1 person
All animals go to heaven and all the grasses are saints, and somewhere in between, and somewhere in between, humans watch a peaceful cloud drifting by…and we smile and nod, kindness is all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It really is Niried. Thank you for that. x
Sun-me upon the Cloud
LikeLike
(gasps and near choaks!) Oh my! Images of Alien(s) dance in my head causing clamy palms and sweaty nervousness! Yikes!
(whispers to self) Must push through….MUST push through….pause 5-seconds….mumble inaudibles….MUST push through!
Hmmm…perhaps I should go through the gallery again. (takes very deep breath!)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Powerful stuff eh?! – nods a great deal and makes him a nice cup of hot tea.
Which in the gallery is the most emotive for you Professor?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ugh…can I have a minute or ten-thousand please? (with eyes larger than bowling-balls!) … Esme’s lazer-stare with accompanying giggle pierces through me! (wink)
Oh damn it! Alright then….. (sigh)
(peaks through his hands over his eyes)….. #2-image. But #9 is really whooly. (ducks and runs into the Exit door that has now rearranged his nose is freaking locked!…moans insue)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I let you have a few moments, in case you might want to change your mind as they’re a tricky bunch to pick a winner from for sure.
Fear not re mine eyes, I have killed very few with my stare. Under twenty at least – laughs but is quite serious.
Good choices, ‘ewe‘ did well when choosing to call the sheep ‘whooly‘ – it fits like a jumper. nods Thanks for stopping by.
LikeLiked by 1 person